Former FBI director James Comey speaks during a hearing before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Capitol Hill June 8, 2017 in Washington, DC.

AI-generated summary reviewed by our newsroom.

Read our AI Policy.

A federal judge approved an order Wednesday that could give former FBI Director James Comey his first access to evidence that prosecutors say will prove he threatened President Donald Trump.

Read more A stinging ant has invaded NC, and its bite can be deadly. How to ID it

The order could help answer a lingering question since Comey’s April indictment: What evidence do prosecutors have beyond an Instagram post showing seashells arranged to read “86 47”?

“Rest assured that it’s not just the Instagram post that leads somebody to get indicted,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a May television interview.

The order, signed by U.S. District Judge Louise Flanagan, governs how evidence can be shared and used by the defense.

“It means they probably haven’t shared any of that information yet and will now that the order has been signed,” said Scott Holmes, a law professor at N.C. Central University.

The order, filed in the federal Eastern District of North Carolina, limits what Comey and his attorneys can do with the evidence they are provided.

“Discovery material provided by the United States may be utilized by the defendant solely in connection with the litigation of this matter, including, among other things, preparation for trial, witness interviews, court filings, motion practice, sentencing (if any), appellate review (if any), and collateral attack (if any) of this case,” the order states.

Holmes described the order as generally routine but noted that it applies to all discovery materials rather than creating a process for designating only certain documents confidential.

While the order keeps the evidence from the public, Comey’s attorneys could still make some of it public through motions, Holmes said.

Sometimes defense attorneys use motions to get information to the public, Holmes said, but they may still need to confer with the government to determine whether material should be filed under seal to comply with a protective order.

On May 15, 2025, Comey posted on Instagram a photo of seashells on a North Carolina beach arranged to read “86 47.”

Trump supporters alleged the numbers were a threat to kill the 47th president, and Comey took the post down, saying he wasn’t aware of the violent connotation.

Read more Mary-Dell Chilton, NC biochemist who revolutionized agriculture, dies at 87

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines 86 as ejecting, dismissing, or removing a person from a place, or an item from a menu.

Federal officials immediately began investigating the alleged threat, according to a motion filed by a prosecutor seeking the protective order.

“The government has compiled discovery in this matter, with the government’s investigation beginning on May 15, 2025, and continuing thereafter,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy Severo wrote in the motion.

The motion, filed just before the protective order Wednesday, states that prosecutors consulted with Comey’s legal team, which consented to the proposed order.

The evidence includes documents that contain “personal identity information of third-party witnesses,” the filing states.

On April 28, a federal North Carolina grand jury indicted Comey on two felonies, accusing him of threatening the president with the post.

Comey’s attorneys are expected to argue the charges should be dismissed on constitutional grounds, including First Amendment protections.

They may also raise arguments about selective or vindictive prosecution. Comey’s team filed a similar motion challenging 2025 charges in Virginia.

Under the current schedule, attorneys’ motions are due July 28. Comey’s arraignment, a hearing in which he would plead guilty or not guilty, is set for 10 a.m. Sept. 30 at the federal courthouse in New Bern.

If the case proceeds to a jury trial, it is scheduled to begin Oct. 21, also in New Bern, where Flanagan is based.

Read more NC lawmaker’s bill on reporting flaws in AI advances. How would it work?

This story was originally published June 25, 2026 at 5:30 AM.

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *