AI-generated summary reviewed by our newsroom.
I’m Brian Gordon, tech reporter for The News & Observer, and this is Open Source, a weekly newsletter on business, labor and technology in North Carolina.
Read more Sheriff Country’s Matt Lauria Teases Mickey, Boone Romance After Complication
North Carolina says it tried to do this the easy way.
On Dec. 11, state commerce officials met with a trio of top VinFast executives to communicate that North Carolina would purchase the carmaker’s dormant Chatham County campus. The state was willing to coordinate with VinFast on any public communications regarding this sale, an olive branch at the end of a doomed partnership.
But in their minds, relinquishing the land that once promised to house a multi-billion-dollar auto factory wasn’t something VinFast could legally resist.
That’s all according to a lawsuit the N.C. Department of Justice filed against VinFast in Wake County court Thursday. The fact there’s now litigation should clue you in on how that December meeting went.
“VinFast rejected this offer and reiterated its plan to construct a facility on the site,” the lawsuit reads, “without explaining how it planned to have an operational facility by its deadline in six months, given that it had yet to erect a single building or structure on the site.”
Yes, a key ingredient to starting a factory is having a factory. Even a semblance of a factory may have satisfied. Instead, the state wanted to recoup the megasite it had already invested millions of taxpayer dollars in. By late 2025, North Carolina had officially lost patience with VinFast.
For years, state commerce officials gave controlled public statements about VinFast’s lingering prospects in North Carolina. This week’s lawsuit details what was happening behind the scenes.
Their marriage (though remarkably rushed) started off well. A ceremony in March 2022 marked VinFast’s arrival. The nascent EV maker would build a 7,500-worker car and battery plant 30 miles southwest of Raleigh. It was an answer to North Carolina’s decades-long pursuit of a major auto assembly facility. In exchange, the state offered VinFast incentives — both performance-based tax benefits and upfront funding to prepare the Chatham campus.
The following summer, North Carolina and VinFast officials convened on the site for a celebratory ribbon-cutting.
Then, nothing. According to the state lawsuit, the site’s general contractor Clayco terminated its VinFast contract in June 2024 over “failure to provide the required proof of financing or capital sufficient to complete construction of the project.”
Read more The weddings that wouldn’t wait — even with Wake’s courthouse closed by chaos
Wary of VinFast’s lack of progress, the state requested that the company send monthly project updates. However, VinFast only provided sporadic updates which lacked meaningful detail,” the lawsuit reads. In December 2024, VinFast ended its contract with the construction firm Barnhill, and its work in Chatham County effectively halted.
The next calendar year brought more communication issues and a fight over a $10,588 bill. In January 2025, the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality notified VinFast that the email address listed as the company’s main point of contact didn’t work. In May, NCDEQ again asked VinFast to update its contact form, the lawsuit states.
That same month, the department told VinFast it had an unpaid fee for an annual air quality permit. The state says it terminated this permit in October over nonpayment.
Such examples of uneven internal corporate organization did echo what former VinFast employees previously told me about the company’s first year in North America.
North Carolina’s lawsuit includes more developments, or the absence of developments. The upshot of the state case is that VinFast has clearly failed to comply with multiple deadlines, and this failure legally entitles North Carolina to take over the land and remarket it to another employer who wants a pad-ready site and proximity to the Triangle. For example, another requirement is that VinFast will have created 1,750 local jobs by the end of this year.
Late Thursday night, a VinFast spokesperson provided me this statement about the lawsuit and said construction is expected to resume. A timeline wasn’t provided.
“We have only become aware of the matter through public media reports and have not yet received any official documentation from the State of North Carolina. We will review and provide an official response once we receive all relevant materials from the State.
“Recent changes in U.S. policies related to the EV industry have impacted the project timeline, requiring additional time for us to evaluate appropriate implementation conditions. Contracts with contractors have already been signed, and construction activities are expected to commence shortly in accordance with the planned schedule.”
Thanks for reading!
Thank you for supporting local journalism. If you liked it, consider sharing it with a friend. If it was forwarded to you, sign up here to subscribe.
Read more Fire Country’s Max Thieriot Breaks Silence on Showrunner Exit, Time Jump
This story was originally published May 22, 2026 at 10:21 AM.