With no lines voters cast their votes in the general election on Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2020 in Seabrook. “We’ve had 179 in-person voters today,” precinct clerk Tiara Glover said as she helped a voter with their ballot.

AI-generated summary reviewed by our newsroom.

Read our AI Policy.

The North Carolina House passed a sweeping elections bill on Tuesday over the objections of Democrats, who argued that it could lead to eligible voters having their ballots thrown out.

Read more NC budget draft gives Charlotte last chance to change I-77 toll vote before payback

The 37-page bill, House Bill 958, includes a wide variety of changes to election law, including creating new avenues to challenge ballots, requiring the Republican state auditor to conduct post-election audits and reducing some campaign finance reporting requirements.

Democrats uniformly voted against the bill, though Republicans had agreed to strip or amend some of the provisions that drew the most backlash.

“A bill that is a little less harmful than the first draft is still not one that we can support or should ever support,” Rep. Phil Rubin, a Wake County Democrat, said.

Republican Rep. Tricia Cotham, who voted against the bill in committee last week, voted in favor of it on Tuesday.

The House’s swing votes, which include unaffiliated Reps. Carla Cunningham and Nasif Majeed, all voted against HB 958. If their votes hold, Republicans would not have the numbers to override a veto from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein.

Furthermore, it’s unclear whether the Senate will even take up the bill. Speaking to reporters last week, Senate leader Phil Berger said he would “withhold judgment” until the House passed its final version.

Read more Sam Page sues Phil Berger’s son, alleging interference in NC Senate campaign

On the House floor, Rep. Hugh Blackwell, the bill’s sponsor, cut out a much-debated section of the bill that would have restricted the ability of election officials to encourage voter turnout. And last week in committee, Republicans amended a section that would have required Auditor Dave Boliek to conduct post-election audits in counties of his choice. Democrats had voiced concerns that he could single out areas where he or his party lost, so the bill was changed to specify that the counties should be chosen randomly.

But even with the change, Democrats questioned why more authority should be given to Boliek and pointed to a recent incident in which a Republican county election official said in a public meeting he had been pressured by the auditor’s office to reject an on-campus early voting site.

House Speaker Destin Hall cut off debate after Rep. Zack Hawkins, a Durham Democrat, accused Republicans of pursuing the legislation to head off a damaging midterm election.

“I think we’re doing this because we see a wave coming,” he said. “And it’s maybe the opposite of the party that we are in, and we think we’re going to lose seats, and we want to make sure we can do all we can to take people off the margins — and that’s just not right.”

Hall said Hawkins had violated House rules by “calling into question the integrity of the members and the reason behind the bill.”

Read more 5 things you need to know about retirement planning in the Triangle, right now

Other provisions in the bill include:

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *